Archive

Archive for November, 2009

“What Do You Do For Fun?” “Kill Russians.”

November 30th, 2009

I had the pleasure of spending American Thanksgiving dinner with a friend of mine in Northern Virginia. His father was an Army doctor stationed at Walter Reed during the heyday of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, and told a simple but insightful story at the table.

As we all know from Charlie Wilson’s War, the United States was supplying a not inconsiderable amount of aid to the Mujahadeen in order to counter Soviet influence in Asia. This aid included medical aid for high-ranking players, and as such, Islamic ‘freedom fighters’ would pass through Walter Reed from time to time for treatment.

My friend’s father describes one such Islamist that he encountered in the 80’s – an obstinately inarticulate man, apparently alive merely for the dual purposes of smoking cigarettes and felling foreign occupiers.

In accordance with Islamic law, he didn’t drink a drop – but smoked like a chimney, I’m told.

I wasn’t there (having not yet been born), but I can imagine the conversation: tobacco wafting through the room, a lit Malboro still burning between the lips of a wounded Afghan man; 1980s hospital decor and the overly sanitized feel of a room only comfortable to those accustomed to regular visits; a gowned doctor leaning over a stubborn, calloused man with a thick Pashtun accent:

-So, what is it that you do in Afghanistan?
-Kill Russian.
-Ah, I see. How about for leisure? What do you do for fun?
-Kill Russian.
-Interesting… Do you have children? What do they do?
-Yes. They Kill. Russian.

I wonder, what would the same militant say today, if he were alive? What would his colleagues-in-arms respond with? Would they answer, “Kill American”? “Kill Canadian”?

The story reminded me of a piece that I read years ago, when I first started getting interested in politics. Jonathan Kay wrote a article in 2006 that has stuck with me since then. It’s still remarkably relevant today:

“At the end of the day, war and politics are both about mobilization. A couple of blunt words from the Pope or some cartoons published in an obscure European newspaper are apparently enough to get mobs of angry Islamists into the street. But here in the West, we can’t even come up with the few thousand extra troops needed to finish off a war we thought we’d already won. We’re fat and lazy. The enemy is mean and hungry.”

As President Obama makes an announcment this week as to troop levels in Afghanistan, we have to consider: do we lack a will comparable to that of the injured Afghan militant?

Our enemies obsess about murdering our soldiers, about ambushes under the coverage of darkness, about improvised explosives on narrow mountain paths. Do we lack the strength to “Kill Al-Qaeda”, to “Kill Taliban”?

Administrative

Are YOU Pure Enough for the GOP?

November 24th, 2009

Tim Mak at FrumForum:

Are YOU pure enough to pass the GOP test?

Yesterday, it emerged that James Bopp, Jr., a Republican National Committeeman from Indiana, was circulating a resolution to be discussed at the RNC’s annual meeting next January in Hawaii.

The resolution, titled Reagan’s Unity Principle for Support of Candidates, outlines ten principles that the sponsors want Republican candidates to adhere to (see below or click on link above for the list). Candidates who did not agree with at least eight of the ten points would be denied RNC funding and the Republican nomination.

Among the many problems in the resolution is the reinforcement of the GOP as the ‘party of no.’ The list focuses mainly on what the Republican Party finds intolerable, rather than what it would seek to achieve.

Seven of the ten policy points are statements of opposition: candidates must oppose future stimulus bills, government-run health care, cap and trade, card check, amnesty for illegal immigrants, and government funding of abortion. That’s fine – but by God, what do you support?

Read more at:
http://www.frumforum.com/are-you-pure-enough-for-the-gop

Administrative

Senate Vote Pushes Health Care to Next Level of Squabbling

November 24th, 2009

Tim Mak in the National Post:

In a rare Saturday night session, U.S. Senators voted strictly along partisan lines to open full debate on health care legislation. With this, the path is cleared for weeks of dizzying debate, hundreds of proposed amendments, and mind-numbing procedural hurdles.

…Already, the cracks are showing. Until mid-Saturday, it was unclear as to whether the Democrats would have the sixty votes needed merely to open debate. Moderate senators such as Ben Nelson, Blanche Lincoln, Mary Landrieu and Joe Lieberman will be the ones to watch over the coming weeks of haggling. All four Senators indicated they had serious reservations about the bill before eventually voting to open debate.”

Read more by clicking here.

Administrative

Ridiculous Global Warming Ad – Polar Bears

November 23rd, 2009

The latest outrage to come from PlaneStupid.com – an ad that is sure to jolt you. If you don’t want to see dead polar bears, then don’t watch.

Administrative

Fraser Institute: Dog Days

November 17th, 2009

Who gets better treatment, your dog or you? Dog Days is the winner of the 2008 Fraser Institute video contest.

The 2009 Fraser Institute video contest is underway now! Details here.

Administrative

Laura Ingraham Show: Frum v. Ziegler on Palin

November 17th, 2009

David Frum and John Ziegler discuss Sarah Palin on the Laura Ingraham show:

Frum argues that Palin “is an enormous source of weakness”, and after a bit of discussion, Ziegler goes crazy at around 8:00.

Administrative

Candice Malcolm: Free to Travel

November 12th, 2009

My friend and former Fraser Institute colleague Candice Malcolm is a new Examiner columnist specializing in topics relating to international travel. She starts out with a piece on how the sacrifices of veterans have allowed us to see the world:

“Imagining the world in chaos and disarray, it is easy to feel a little guilty about the ease and comfort with which I can now visit these same locations. I travel for leisure, assured of my safety, and filled with excitement to explore and discover; whereas the brave men and women of generations past made the same journey for the purpose of wartime duty, unsure of their future, surrounded by fear and death.

Instead I realize that it is not guilt I should feel, but instead joy that peace-treaties have been signed and a relative global balance of power exists, consequently so much of the world is stable, peaceful, open, and accessible to the Canadian traveler.”

Read more by clicking here.

Imagining the world in chaos and disarray, it is easy to feel a little guilty about the ease and comfort with which I can now visit these same locations. I travel for leisure, assured of my safety, and filled with excitement to explore and discover; whereas the brave men and women of generations past made the same journey for the purpose of wartime duty, unsure of their future, surrounded by fear and death. Instead I realize that it is not guilt I should feel, but instead joy that peace-treaties have been signed and a relative global balance of power exists, consequently so much of the world is stable, peaceful, open, and accessible to the Canadian traveler.

Administrative

FrumForum at the Bachmann Tea Party on Capitol Hill

November 7th, 2009

FrumForum interviews protestors on Capitol Hill – here are some of the nuttiest responses that we received.

Administrative

Tea Partiers: We’re Not Republican

November 6th, 2009

Tim Mak at FrumForum:

FrumForum interviews Tea Partiers at the Bachmann Tea Party on Capitol Hill. Surprisingly, we find that the vast majority of protesters are not Republican. In fact, they’re just as likely to oppose the Republican Party as they are to support it. Find the article and videos of the interviews here.

Administrative

FrumForum: The Limbaugh Effect

November 4th, 2009

Tim Mak at FrumForum:

Conservative Doug Hoffman lost handily last night, and among those to blame: Rush Limbaugh. The day before the vote, Limbaugh compared Scozzafava’s actions to bestiality.

Look at the polls: about a fifth undecided on the eve of Election Day. How many voters do you think were driven away by Limbaugh’s comments?

Hoffman lost by four points, which means that two percent of voters switching from Owens to Hoffman would have flipped the race. Did Limbaugh make the difference?

Read more by clicking here.

Administrative